Monthly Archives: June 2012

You could’ve given us news, but you gave us…

Putting the ‘AP’ in ‘GAP’ and ‘CRAP’.

Aren’t you tired of tuning into the news and then feeling like you’re watching Extra or Entertainment Tonight instead? The Associated Press, which does about a 2-minute newscast at the top of every hour on many talk radio stations, devotes at least one story, or roughly a quarter of its broadcast, to entertainment news.

I was quite incredulous when AP reported on changes at the Today show, whereby Ann Curry (who?) offered her teary-eyed farewell. This story was reported for two 2 days running. Day 2 was about the search to replace Curry. She did a freaking one-year stint (a three-hour tour? A THREE-HOUR TOUR????) on the Today Show. That’s a two-day news story?

For Pete’s sake, it wasn’t like she was Regis or Katie Couric, or Johnny Carson - I.e., an institution on the particular show. A two-day story that wastes our time – for two days – while supplanting real news items?

Meanwhile, today, the AP included in its radio newscast that Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes are getting a divorce. Thanks!

Heck, my local CBS affiliate emailed this story to its news followers as “breaking news”.

For the love of Lindsay Lohan, somebody stop the madness and start the real reporting! You know, try reporting on those things that matter to us, like many local news purport to do with their slogans like, “Reporting what matters… to YOU.”

UPDATE: I’m told that, while Curry was the co-anchor for the past year, she’d been a field reporter for 15 years with the Today Show. I don’t think I’ve ever watched the Today Show, for what it’s worth. I stand by my original point and add this: when the people who report the news become the news, I can only think of Albert Brooks’ line in one of my favorite movies of all time, “Broadcast News” – when he said derisively, “That’s right, let’s not forget… we’re the story, not them.”

Only one place to go for real analysis of Supreme Court ruling

America is UnAmerican.

Boy am I sick and tired of the MNPs (Media Narrative Parrots) analyzing everything purely from the political perspective. Over and over yesterday, we heard that the Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Healthcare Act was “a win for Obama”.

Who cares what the political ramifications are? What we as news consumers should be seeking is actual analysis of what this means to the country, not whose political team won or lost. But that’s the MNPs for you. Many local news organizations offer slogans like, “Reporting what’s important to you.”

Yet, telling me that this is a win for one side and a loss for another is telling me nothing. It completely misses the real story.

And that’s why there’s talk radio and that’s why it flourishes. The only real analysis I heard yesterday was from two independent Conservatives on radio, Glenn Beck and Michael Savage.

Beck told us, “I have no idea how to run my business” following this ruling. That’s real. This morning he gave further perspective on the Commerce Clause and how it was enacted and the impacts of being able to tax non-behavior.

Savage told us we are now on our way to becoming Venezuela or Cuba and that is the goal of the American Left. Healthcare is usually at the center of ideologies of Socialist/Communist countries. He said (paraphrased) we aren’t falling, we have fallen. America is over, he said. This may seem hyperbolic but my point is that it’s real analysis about the impacts of the legislation and the Court’s ruling to ostensibly uphold it. It’s about what this means to us, not who scored a political victory today.

This wasn’t a baseball game or a tennis match. This was a major decision that impacts the future shape of the country and that’s the type of news analysis it deserved.

Norman and Faldo deprive Senior golf fans.

Renowned (but not renewed) rivalry

We are once again about to embark on the busiest 5-week stretch of Senior golf. With that in mind, the thing that struck me most when my favorite golfer, Tom Watson, turned 50 and joined the Champions Tour is that his 1970s and 80s rivalry with Jack Nicklaus, 10 years his elder, would not be recaptured on the Champions Tour. When Watson was 25 and coming into his own as a player, Nicklaus was 35 and still in his prime. In the same manner, Nicklaus was Arnold Palmer’s junior by 10 years, which made for a prolonged stretch of great rivalry golf.

However, that 10 year difference in age manifested itself much differently with Watson at 50 and Nicklaus at 60. Jack was hardly even playing on the Champions Tour at that point. Thus, there would not be a renewed duel at Turnberry (where the Senior Open Championship is played as part of the rotation) or at Pebble Beach (home of the Champions Tour’s First Tee Open).

So, while age differences deprived us of a natural Watson-Nicklaus Champions Tour rivalry, the potential existed to recapture perhaps the best 1980s and 90s golf rivalry, between Nick Faldo and Greg Norman. They dueled a few times on world golf’s greatest stage, the Open Championship (Faldo won 3 and Norman won 2 – his only 2 majors), and of course there was the legendary 1996 Faldo comeback from six shots back at Augusta to beat Norman.

For whatever reason – and I acknowledge that injury has played a role in this – we are not getting to see this rivalry renewed. I mention injuries, which apply to the ever-inundated Norman, who tried to engage the Champions Tour and even made an impressive run at the Open Championship in 2008 at age 53 (the year before Watson came even closer to winning at Turnberry at 59).

As for Faldo, he did begin playing in Champions Tour events when he first turned 50 but it didn’t last long. I’ve tried to find out why but have been unsuccessful. His presence on the Champions Tour would be welcome – especially given that he’d give his fans a chance to see a Faldo 2.0, i.e., a more relaxed and engaging personality, than they saw of the aloof and elusive Faldo 1.0 when he was winning 6 majors.

I presume Faldo is simply more comfortable doing golf analysis than he would be playing. I had hoped that seeing recent runs at regular tour majors by Champions Tour players might inspire Faldo to give it another try. I would note that lately Faldo hasn’t been seen doing analysis on The Golf Channel or CBS, so perhaps he is going to play this summer? He’s exempt several more years at The Open, which is followed the next week by the Senior Open (which returns to Turnberry this year). Those events are followed by the US Senior Open, capping the best stretch of Senior golf.

One can only hope that’s what’s happening. I’m going do some searching on the Internet to find out. Maybe Norman will be back as well. Maybe we’ll be lucky enough get a chance to see the two of them duel again. As for Watson, who’s been almost completely nonexistent this year due to non-golf injuries, I’m hoping his return to Turnberry – where he has already won both the Open and the Senior Open, will be triumphant. In fact, he and Faldo enjoyed brief rivalry moments – a very young Faldo beating Watson at the 1979 Ryder Cup and Watson beating the young Faldo at Troon in 1982.

A Lifetime of the same movie over and over

Seen it!

How many times can they make the same movie? Look no further than the Lifetime Movie Network to find out. Lifetime has been known for two recurring movie themes; you know the ones. There’s the “strong woman escapes abusive husband and gets her revenge” storyline. Then there’s also the patented, “crazy home-wrecker woman destroys a family” narrative.

We’ve seen these over and over, but the other day on Lifetime I saw something new. The network had adopted another recurring theme seen often in theaters but rarely if ever on Lifetime. It was the, “organ transplant recipient takes on the memories of the deceased donor” story. Turns out the film was made 10 years ago. It’s called “Heart of a Stranger” starring Jane Seymour. I didn’t see much of it, but ultimately I’ve seen it before.

This particular storyline typically follows that of the “family moves into the ghost house” narrative, in that the objective is to solve the mystery of how the donor (or former inhabitant of ghost house) was killed. Only then can the deceased ghost move on; come to think of it, I don’t recall what happens to the organ recipients once they’ve convinced the authorities that the donor was murdered. I suppose he/she is no longer haunted by the donor’s memories.

Now if only they’d make a movie about movie fans no longer being haunted by the same movie over and over. Only when the writers and producers of such movies are brought to justice can the movie fans be at peace.

Play the NHL Draft Drinking Game

Pour yourself a Draft, ay?

During the NHL season, my drinking game as a New Jersey Devils fan is to take a swig every time the announcer says, “Ponikarovsky”. Why? To quote Jack Nicholson’s Joker character, “I just like the sound of it.”

However, my original NHL drinking game was based on the league’s annual Draft. It’s a simple one: you take a drink every time someone says the word, “Organization” – here’s the key, when an individual associated with hockey says that word, he/she is most likely to pronounce it, “Organ-EYE-zation”.

That’s what prompts the drink.

Warning: I hope you have a high tolerance for alcohol; then again, you don’t have to drink alcohol when playing a drinking game.

You’ve got two days, including tonight, to enjoy the annual festivities.

Stay thirsty, my friends.

ESPN-NBC mostly misses Simpson story.

Simpson, ay?

This week’s coverage also taught us another lesson on networks focusing too much on the handful at the very top of the leaderboard and on the star players. When a Webb Simpson ends up winning, we feel somewhat deprived because we hardly saw any of him all week. I don’t know if we saw him at all for the first 60 holes of the tournament.

He finished the first 2 rounds at 5 over par, so we weren’t going to see him either of those days unless he has holed out somewhere. On Saturday, as long as he parring his way around, but still 4 to 6 shots behind the leaders, again, he’s not a big enough name for NBC to show us. So we didn’t see him, even as he shot 68 and inched his way closer to the lead.

On Sunday, I believe they finally picked up on the Simpson story when he birdied the 6th (though obviously that was shown recorded rather than live – until he started making birdies, we weren’t going to see him). Heck, did we even see him tee off on Sunday? He was ahead of Tiger, but they showed us Tiger teeing off.

Again, it goes to show that the lesson here is to show as many players as you possibly can throughout the tournament; don’t just focus on the leaders and bigger names – because a Webb Simpson, like so many others in the field, is capable of winning it.

I’d like to say that NBC learned its lesson; unfortunately, I know better.

A Mixed up way to watch the Open

A mix for the eclectic

When you have OCD as I do, it’s tough to ever get off the Directv mix channel during a golf or tennis major event. What happens to me is that I have this hang-up about knowing something is happening live and not wanting to wait even a few moments later to see it.

That’s how the mix channels enter the mix, though, as I’ve lamented before, feature screens that are just large enough (even on a big screen TV) that you can barely see the result of the golf shot, i.e., where the ball landed and finished. In particular, once I noticed that the “Featured Group” and “8th and 18th” feeds were a full 5 seconds (yes, I timed it) ahead of the national feed, I stuck with those channels. In addition, watching the mix channel makes you the director (hence the Directv slogan, “Don’t just watch TV, Direct TV.”).

From one screen you can move the featured audio to each of the four channels to hear the commentary. Often, I would watch the live shot on the Featured Group channel and immediately flip to the national feed audio to hear what those commentators had to say. Also, when you watch the mix channel you get a true sense of how many of the shots you see on the national feed are recorded - a high percentage of those are presented by the broadcast team as if they are live.

Plus, after this weekend’s experience, I have to rethink my prior notion that the presence of the leaderboard as part of the mix channel (see image above) is superfluous and detracts from the size of the four video screens. In reality, my eyes consistently glanced over to see the live movement among the top 10 players. Again, this was another way to demonstrate how many of the shots shown on the national telecast weren’t live. If the national feed went to commercial and with a player on a non-featured mix channel hole with a short putt remaining, you could check the live leaderboard to see if that player (if in the Top 10) converted the putt. If out of the Top 10, you push the red button on the remote to get the full leaderboard (though it covers the entire screen).

So, I did it. Both Saturday and Sunday, I squinted my eyes and watched the entire coverage on the mix channel – up until the very end on Sunday when the Featured Group reached the 18th tee and were the only two players remaining in the mix.

One of the two Featured Groups on Sunday’s mix was Tiger Woods and Casey Wittenburg. The coverage began long before the two teed off at 1:50 PM PDT. We saw Woods warming up but not Wittenburg. It is because of coverage like this that I thought to myself, “Wouldn’t it be great if Wittenburg outplayed Woods?”

He did, by 3 shots.

I also enjoyed the 3-person team covering the primary Featured Group of Furyk and McDowell, from the ESPN crew, it was Terry Gannon (ex NC St. shooting guard), Phil Blackmar and Jane Crafter. They did a nice job over the 4 days. I can’t help but wonder when ESPN shows highlights in the future whether they’ll use commentary from this feed instead of the Dan Hicks-Johnny Miller feed from NBC.

Meanwhile, I’m pretty livid during the postgame coverage on the Golf Channel due to the manner in which they are diminishing the accomplishment of joint second place finisher Michael Thompson. What a story he was. He was the outright leader by 3 shots after Thursday – yet he was hardly discussed that night. Other stories took center: Woods is back, Rory McIlroy and Luke Donald played poorly among them.

Then, as you’d expect, Thompson fell back to Earth on Friday and again on Saturday. Then a great thing happened: he finished today with a 67 and wound up 1 shot out of the lead. He had a short birdie putt on 17 that, had he converted and if everything else occurred the same way afterwards, we’d be talking about a two-way playoff tomorrow.

Yet all the talk is about Furyk and McDowell and how they finished. I haven’t heard them mention Thompson yet. Of course, they list McDowell’s name before Thompson’s on the Golf Channel postgame show leaderboard, even though the official leaderboard correctly displays Thompson’s name first (he finished his round before McDowell; but I covered this phenomenon yesterday – TV coverage now goes with the “bigger” name first instead of who finished earliest among tied players).

Finally, you shouldn’t be surprised to be hearing the prototypical, “The sky’s the limit now for (winner) Webb Simpson” commentary.

I would caution you, however, that they said that about basically every first-time major winner since I’ve been watching golf. It doesn’t always turn out that way. For example, since Lucas Glover’s US Open win in 2009, he has practically disappeared from the face of the Earth. So who knows what will happen with Simpson. Pro golf is so competitive now that you can’t assume a Simpson, even though he won this one at the young age of 26, will ever win another one.

Well, I can’t wait for the British Open. It has been my favorite sporting event (bigger than the Super Bowl) for me since the early 80s when Tom Watson was winning his final few of his 5 Opens. I enjoy the links courses and the International flavor of the event.

Fittingly then, is that the Open Championship also features the best of the Directv mix editions. This is because they give you the BBC feed throughout the event. That feed includes Jim Nantz for an hour each day. It also featured Peter Alyss (who does an hour or so each day on the ESPN US feed as well) and British senior player Mark James. The commentary is very enjoyable from the Brits. They don’t worry too much about being politically correct and the colorful expressions are also a fun insight into their culture.

In ’09 on Friday, after Tom Watson had given back all 5 shots to par he had scored the day before on the front nine of Round 2, I watched him play the middle three holes at Turnberry on one of the mix channels and he proceeded to birdie 2 of the 3 (and par the other). It got him right back in the tournament.

In 2010, I sat back and watched the entire BBC feed as Louis Oostheizen coasted to victory on Sunday. There are a lot of great storylines heading into the Open – with Padraig Harrington’s resurgence being one of them.

Can’t… wait!

Then Tom Watson, if he can overcome a nagging wrist injury he suffered while riding the lawn mower, returns to Turnberry for the Senior Open Championship the following week. No mix channel but at least ESPN is covering has been covering it live the last couple years.

To quote Jimmy Conway (played by DeNiro) in Good Fellas: “It’s gonna be a great summer!”

Live From… Tiger’s perspective

Lern-ing to cope with all-Tiger coverage

Rich Lerner, whose essays I usually enjoy, began this Live From edition by making it all about Tiger’s quest, which included telling us that there are several players “poised to keep him stuck at 14″.

Um, funny but I figured they were merely trying to win the championship. Oh well, the “everything from the Tiger perspective” coverage is, unfortunately, par for the course these days.

Here you have Jim Furyk and Graeme McDowell each bidding for his second US Open win. You have Lee Westwood looking to finally break through in a major. You have Cinderella stories like Blake Adams, James Peterson, Frederick Jacobsen and the 17-year old amateur Beau Hossler. You have the venerable South Africans Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, each shooting for his third US Open title. So many sidelines.

But really, per Lerner’s open, they are all merely obstacles to Tiger’s quest for the major championship victory record. Par for the very difficult US Open course.

‘Tiger Practice Today’ starts earlier than expected Sunday.

Practice? We’re talkin’ about watchin’ practice?

Earlier today I Tweeted that “Tiger Practice Today” was about to start. It was 2 PM PDT – a full hour before 2nd round co-leader Tiger Woods was scheduled to tee off.

“Tiger Practice Today” is a play on the Yankees Entertainment Sports (YES) Network’s pregame show called “Batting Practice Today”. It, too, begins an hour before Yankee game times – though, much to my dismay, it seldom features any actual (live or recorded) batting practice.

On “Tiger Practice Today” – however, we see plenty of practice. Also, as opposed to the Yankee pregame production, there is live action taking place on the course when we see his (and nobody else’s) practice.

So, based on Tiger’s underachieving 5-over par round today that dropped him from 1st to 14th, let this be a warning that tomorrow, the “Tiger Practice Today” pregame show starts earlier than you’d have probably thought. In fact, it will begin as soon as the 1 PM PDT NBC broadcast begins (because Woods’ tee time is at 1:50).

So now you know what to expect when you tune in tomorrow. Oh, and “Tiger Practice Today” is immediately followed by “Tiger Walks from the Practice Green to the Tee” and then “Tiger stands at the 1st tee and waits for his turn” shows.

It’s ba-ack! The usually-misplaced cactus wren returns!

“I don’t have to show you any cactus.”

I admit, I hadn’t heard it in a long time. Today, however, the most misplaced sound effect in TV and movies made its triumphant return in a Hyundai ad. That sound – you already know this if you’ve read the blog long enough – is that of the cactus wren.

It’s devilishly funny to me that the name of the bird that makes this particular call is “cactus wren” – strictly because its name should have clearly defined for Foley sound artists (Is that still a relevant term? Probably not.) when the effect should be deployed. However, we often hear the cactus wren but rarely is a cactus anywhere near the place the effect is depicted. Typically it’s used in jungles or forests to imply that the scene is in a place where wild animals that make foreign sounds exist.

In the case of today’s Hyundai ad, there was a racetrack, with many trees surrounding it, not cacti, mind you; just plain old trees.

I have spent a considerable amount of time in Arizona over the last decade so I can tell you I’ve heard the natural sound in its natural environment. That’s where it belongs.

Ah, what’s the use. I must be the only person on Earth who cares that they misuse this effect, so go ahead on… keep doin’ what you’re doin’ and I’ll keep being the only person who notices.